<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technolotics #14 &#8211; Blame it on Francis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technolotics.com/blog/2005/11/technolotics-14-blame-it-on-francis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technolotics.com/blog/2005/11/technolotics-14-blame-it-on-francis/</link>
	<description>Forming opinions, so you don't have to.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:56:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daryl</title>
		<link>http://technolotics.com/blog/2005/11/technolotics-14-blame-it-on-francis/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 21:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technolotics.com/blog/2005/11/technolotics-14-blame-it-on-francis/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Hi, guys. Thanks for featuring us in your broadcast. I got a kick out of your banter (let me assure you that we do not condone folksodomy!). To address a couple of points you brought up:

- Our RSS story is incomplete as yet. We don&#039;t support export to OPML, etc. I think there are bugs already logged for that and other enhancements to make feeds in Flock much more useful.

- I&#039;ve never heard a report of the back button weirdness you mention. If you can reproduce it consistently, it&#039;d be peachey if you&#039;d log a bug for it. :)

There are definitely a lot of things like these that we need to get fixed. As you speculate, we did feel a bit of a crunch to get something out there. We&#039;re generally following the &quot;release early and often and try like hell to get the community involved&quot; approach, which naturally has tradeoffs that you guys hit on.

In any case, overwhelmingly positive review or not, I enjoyed hearing what you guys had to say, and I hope you&#039;ll wait a month or two and try the browser again to see if at least some of the rough edges are smoothed out. We may not (yet!) be revolutionary in a month, but don&#039;t forget that we&#039;re less than four months down our path, and Firefox was 5 years in the making before it became mainstream. So give us a *leetle* more time. Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, guys. Thanks for featuring us in your broadcast. I got a kick out of your banter (let me assure you that we do not condone folksodomy!). To address a couple of points you brought up:</p>
<p>- Our RSS story is incomplete as yet. We don&#8217;t support export to OPML, etc. I think there are bugs already logged for that and other enhancements to make feeds in Flock much more useful.</p>
<p>- I&#8217;ve never heard a report of the back button weirdness you mention. If you can reproduce it consistently, it&#8217;d be peachey if you&#8217;d log a bug for it. <img src='http://www.technolotics.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>There are definitely a lot of things like these that we need to get fixed. As you speculate, we did feel a bit of a crunch to get something out there. We&#8217;re generally following the &#8220;release early and often and try like hell to get the community involved&#8221; approach, which naturally has tradeoffs that you guys hit on.</p>
<p>In any case, overwhelmingly positive review or not, I enjoyed hearing what you guys had to say, and I hope you&#8217;ll wait a month or two and try the browser again to see if at least some of the rough edges are smoothed out. We may not (yet!) be revolutionary in a month, but don&#8217;t forget that we&#8217;re less than four months down our path, and Firefox was 5 years in the making before it became mainstream. So give us a *leetle* more time. Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
